paleoaerie

Home » Reviews » Book reviews » The Natural History Museum Book of Dinosaurs

The Natural History Museum Book of Dinosaurs

If you are ever in London, the Natural History Museum (NHM) is a must see attraction. It ranks among the top natural history museums around. Schedule more than one day to see all the exhibits if you can, including their popular dinosaur exhibit that always draws large crowds. Many people have complained about the poor lighting and limited viewing space in that particular exhibit, but even with that, it is not to be missed. Accompanying the dinosaurs in the museum is an extensive online collection of fossil information, covering a wide range of dinosaurs. So given this, it should not surprise anyone that the NHM has put out a dinosaur book. The first edition of the book came out in 1993, with three more editions published since then, the latest one in 2006. We know a lot more about dinosaurs now than we did even ten years ago though, so how well does it hold up? Pretty well, for the most part, although a few Americans might be a bit perplexed by the British spelling that is occasionally different from American English. The NHM has a nice website on dinosaurs, which serves as a nice supplement to the book.

It is a long review, so if you want to skip to the summary conclusions, click here.

The Natural History Museum Book of Dinosaurs

51t8mO3z0sL._SX390_BO1,204,203,200_by Tim Gardom and Angela Milner

Publication Date: 2006. 144 pg.

Carlton Books. ISBN: 1-84442-183-X, 978-1-84442-183-1

AR Book Level: Not listed

Recommended for 10-14 year olds

Angela Milner has been a well respected paleontologist for decades and has been the leading researcher for dinosaurs at the NHM since the eighties, so if anyone is going to write a book about dinosaurs for the museum, it’s Dr. Milner. Tim Gardom is primarily known for this book, but he has had extensive experience writing for museum exhibits, including the dinosaur exhibit at NHM, meaning that he has practiced the art of writing technical material in a way that can be readily understood by nontechnical and diverse audiences.

This book can be considered an extension of the exhibit at the museum, taking what is there and expanding upon it considerably, forming an extended guidebook. It is not a catalogue of dinosaurs, though, such as Brusatte and Benton’s Dinosaurs. This book places dinosaurs in context within their world, focusing more on what dinosaurs were and how they lived over listing the different types, although it does that as well. More importantly, it talks about how paleontologists came to the conclusions they have, what is the evidence for what we think.

While extensively illustrated with a wide array of photographs of real fossils, paintings and illustrations of reconstructed dinosaurs, and the people and places, it is not a picture book. The text is extensive, but easily readable and should be readily accessible by any interested kid of middle school age or beyond, while still being a good read for adults.

The book has ten chapters broken up into an introduction to dinosaurs and the Mesozoic Era, five chapters on the lifestyles of the dinosaurs, an obligatory chapter on dinosaur extinction, a chapter on the history of dinosaur research, a chapter dealing specifically with how paleontologists piece together the clues to interpret the fossils, and finally ending with the now seemingly obligatory chapter on the evolution of dinosaurs to birds.

Chapter one is noteworthy for its debunking of some popular myths about evolution in general and dinosaurs in particular. It starts immediately with dispensing with the old chestnuts of “survival of the fittest” and the idea that dinosaurs died out because they were not “fit”. They properly describe evolution as being a product of those who are more capable of surviving in a particular environment and successfully reproducing, not necessarily the biggest and strongest. They go on to discuss what types of fossils are found and how they are formed which, while in general good, neglects the important contributions of microbes to the fossilization process. But to be fair, we know much more about that now than we did then and the purely physical processes listed here are still described the same way in almost every book published today. They also do a good job describing what a dinosaur is and is not. They separate animals commonly thought to be dinosaurs, such as dimetrodons, pterosaurs, and marine reptiles, from true dinosaurs. The biggest problem with this section is that the illustrations are poor. The Tyrannosaurus would not pass muster in the first edition, much less now, and the Deinonychus is out of date. Moreover, they continue to use the term “mammal-like reptile”, rather than the more accepted term synapsid, which makes this section appear severely dated. They still use the term “thecodont” to describe the earliest archosaurs that led to dinosaurs, although they at least do say it is an informal term, not one that is formally accepted. The problem with thecodont as a term is that it throws everything with a similar jaw together, whether or not they are related. The bulk of the chapter is a good, but necessarily brief description of the Mesozoic Era, including the position of the continents, the changing climate, and the evolution of plants and animals during this time, focusing of course on the dinosaurs, but not to the exclusion of everything else, which provides the necessary context for dinosaur evolution during this time.

Chapter two is all about movement and tells the story of how dinosaurs went from a lizard-like sprawl to a fully erect posture and the advantages that gave. There is discussion of some of the evidence we have for different gaits and stances, including a lot of discussion about trackways, as well as the diversity in the ways an erect stance has been utilized. The stories of early ideas is an interesting read, although they make one serious error by saying all sauropods had their nostrils on the top of their heads, when in fact they had their noses at the end of their snouts like every other terrestrial animal. I also think they give too much time to the debate over whether or not tyrannosaurs were scavengers or hunters, even though they do eventually come down on the side of hunters, as pretty much every paleontologist does. The tyrannosaur as scavenger debate was getting a lot of press during the time of publication, but it died down pretty quickly, with no one really accepting it anymore, considering there is evidence of active hunting by tyrannosaurs. Go to the Denver Museum of Nature and Science and you will see an edmontosaur with a healed bite taken out of its back.

Chapter three discusses food, how different dinosaurs ate, so one can expect several pictures of skulls and teeth. This chapter gets high marks for discussing current research at the time, such as Emily Rayfield’s work using Finite Element Analysis to determine bite force in several dinosaurs. Criticisms of the chapter include too much credence given to the idea that tyrannosaurs were scavengers which they revisit in this chapter, the discussion of neck posture in sauropods, and missing an important aspect of the tyrannosaur coprolite studies. These criticisms are mostly due to advances since the book was published, not a fault of the authors.  The neck posture study has the problem of not sufficiently allowing for cartilage between the vertebrae, nor the fact that living animals bend their necks farther than allowed by that study on a regular basis. The tyrannosaur coprolite study also found remnants of muscle, which indicates a short digestion time. This is a strong indicator of an endothermic animal. Either that or an animal suffering some serious diarrhea. Finally, the chewing cycle of hadrosaurs is no longer as accepted as it was then. Casey Holliday makes a good case that the bones of the skull thought to move during chewing were really much better bound together in life, the supposed joints more an accommodation of quick growth, not for chewing (sadly, the link to the pdf of the paper in the linked article is no longer valid, but the article provides a good summary of the paper).

61VQmRrCOGL

Chapter four is attack and defense. Interestingly, this chapter discusses tyrannosaurs as hunters, ignoring the scavenger discussion of the previous chapter, providing some indication on where the authors fell in that debate. This chapter does a great job of discussing different techniques for combat and predator avoidance. High marks to this chapter for balanced discussion of current research. I particularly liked the discussion about the role of color in camouflage and display. The biggest gripe about this chapter is the presentation of theropods like Troodon as scaly when we know they were covered in feathers. It doesn’t change the discussion in the text, which is still valid and interesting, but it is a flaw in the presentation.

NHMbook

Chapter five is about social organization, a topic not often covered well in books like this and is possibly my favorite chapter in the book. There are some interesting discussions here that will make one think about these animals as living animals within an ecological context. I would note that there is more evidence of group behavior of tyrannosaurs than was known at the time of publication, so they may have been more gregarious than thought then. I would have liked a bit more explicit discussion of the possibility of Deinonychus as opportunistic groups rather than a cohesive pack, but the discussions do a great job of keeping facts that we know and speculation about behaviors.

Chapter six is titled “Living animals”. This chapter gets into the detailed work of anatomy and molecular studies used to figure out how the animals were put together functionally and metabolically, as well as what their anatomical details tell us about behaviors. It serves as a nice introduction to the real work of paleontologists as more than just digging up fossils. It is a nice chapter and a great read. There are a few things that are a bit off, but not much. They discuss the discovery of actual soft tissue reported from a few dinosaur bones, such as proteins, blood cells, and blood vessels. They do not mention, however, that not everyone accepts those discoveries, instead concluding that what was found were more modern bacterial traces and not dinosaur soft tissue. Nevertheless, it is a good inclusion in the chapter. Our understanding of just how many dinosaurs had feathered has also grown dramatically since the book was published. Few people took the idea of a feathered, adult tyrannosaur seriously ten years ago, but we now have evidence some large tyrannosaurs were indeed feathered. They also make determining brain size in dinosaurs sound much easier than it really is because the amount of non-brain material in the cranial cavity varies substantially in animals other than mammals and birds. The evidence of color vision in dinosaurs, on the other hand, is stronger than presented in the book and we can pretty securely state that dinosaurs had not only color vision, but better color vision than we do. The book also uses a picture of a tyrannosaur with ridiculously large olfactory lobes that we now know is wrong. Tyrannosaurs had large olfactory lobes, indicating a good sense of smell, but they weren’t as large as presented in the book. The book devotes a decent chunk of space to the question of thermoregulation, although it is still necessarily brief, which they acknowledge, as it is a complicated discussion. For what space they have, they did a good job. I would say the idea of dinosaurs being endothermic for the most part is more accepted now than at the time of publication with new evidence pushing the debate in that direction.

Chapter seven concerns the mass extinction at the end of the Cretaceous. It does a good job of discussing the extinction event, including what did NOT go extinct, which complicates the picture. The evidence of a massive impact has been firmly established even more so than when the book was published. The role it played and whether it was the sole cause or the giant nail in the coffin, adding to the volcanism and changing climate, is still debated.

8133zZe1qtL

Chapter eight is called “Dinosaurs and people” and is mostly a short history of dinosaur discoveries. Chapter nine discusses what it takes to go from a discovered fossil to an understanding of the life and relationships of the animal in question. Between this chapter and chapter six, the work of paleontologists is given a good accounting and should make for a useful read for any budding paleontologist. What has been added since is a huge increase in technology which has increased data sharing, allowed people to form collaborations easier, and made modeling and experiments much easier, allowing more people to make significant contributions.

The final chapter discusses the evidence that birds are dinosaurs. The book discusses several feathered dinosaurs, but our knowledge of them and the diversity of feathered dinosaurs has grown by orders of magnitude since then. We have even found evidence of melanosomes, subcellular organelles that provide the pigment, which has allowed the determination of color in a few cases. The chapter has a good section on the origin of flight, providing the classic hypotheses, but also includes newer ideas that have greatly added to our understanding of flight, making the old hypotheses incomplete, with portions of both providing a much better answer. The book does state one thing that I would cross out. They state “It seems likely that a simple insulating cover arose first and was later modified for display, signalling, and finally flight.” This is a common belief even among paleontologists, but it is simply wrong. It is highly unlikely that feathers first arose as an insulating cover as the initial stages would have done the exact opposite of providing insulation by increasing surface area without a concurrent increase in insualtion. It is far, far more likely that feathers evolved for display purposes and were then adapted for insulation.

The book ends with a section providing data on several specific dinosaurs, a glossary, suggested sources for further reading, and a useful index.

In summary, the book is a great read. It provides an excellent look at dinosaurs as more than a stamp collection of strange creatures, but as living animals within the context of a real ecosystem.  The book gives a better view of the real work of paleontologists than you will find in almost any other source. There are several places in which the science has advanced, making some specifics here and there in need of updating, but the meat of the book is still solid and provides substantial benefit to interested readers. It provides commentary in a much more thoughtful manner than is found in most other books and will make the reader think about concepts in a way rarely seen. The book shows science as a dynamic, changing field where no matter how many answers you get, there are always more questions and every piece of data requires a reexamination of the answers you already have to see if the answers are still valid. Dinosaur science is not extinct, it is still evolving and you definitely get that feeling here.

yckkga9cE

 


8 Comments

  1. Herman Diaz says:

    1stly, many many thanks for writing this review. As implied by my FB comment, it’s MUCH more than I ever expected. I’m especially glad that I wrote my review 1st, otherwise I would’ve taken forever figuring out how to write something semi-decent & original about this book (which is often the case when reviewing books already reviewed by MUCH better writers).

    2ndly, w/all due respect, I think you were a bit too hard on some of the hypotheses presented in this book (although I understand why). Specifically, I’m referring to “the discussion of neck posture in sauropods” & “the chewing cycle of hadrosaurs”. Yes, they’ve gotten more complex since 2006, but they’re still valid based on what I’ve read (E.g. The highlighted parts in the following links).

    The former: https://books.google.com/books?id=RDq5Szn7afoC&pg=PA114&dq=%22sauropods+are+typically+regarded%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CB0Q6AEwAGoVChMIocSx5pjSxwIViO0eCh1mNA8L#v=onepage&q=%22sauropods%20are%20typically%20regarded%22&f=false

    The latter: https://books.google.com/books?id=t8dwWakrlm0C&pg=PA187&dq=%22originally%22+%22ornithopod+feeding%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CB0Q6AEwAGoVChMI4KKEs5ClyAIVijo-Ch3UnQyD#v=onepage&q=%22originally%22%20%22ornithopod%20feeding%22&f=false

    3rdly, I’m curious what you think my review & whether its analogies accurately describe this book: A more family-friendly version of Sampson’s Dinosaur Odyssey: Fossil Threads in the Web of Life; The “Dinosaurs: Ancient Fossils, New Discoveries” exhibition in book form ( http://www.amnh.org/exhibitions/past-exhibitions/dinosaurs-ancient-fossils-new-discoveries ). I think they do, but wanted a 2nd opinion.

    4thly, would you agree that this book in general & Chapter 8 in particular makes a good case for why dinos are important today? I think it does, but wanted a 2nd opinion.

    Lastly, is the cover of your copy different from the 1 in the 1st picture? I ask b/c the inside flaps in the 4th picture look different from those of my copy.

  2. paleoaerie says:

    Glad you liked the review. It’s a good book and deserves to be in dinosaur book collections. Thanks for recommending the book to me.

    In regards to neck posture in sauropods, it is true that there are paleontologists who continue to support these views, but not as many as did then, I think for very good reason. The study of Stevens and Parrish (1999), while widely accepted when it came out, has some anatomical issues making their conclusions inaccurate. Therefore, any discussion of neck posture in sauropods is lacking without mention of those problems. Have you read the work of Tayler, Wedel, and Naish?

    https://www.app.pan.pl/archive/published/app54/app54-213.pdf

    I meant to put this link in the review, so this is a fine time to include it. I think they do a fine job of demonstrating many of the reasons why it is likely that sauropods had more diverse neck postures than envisioned by many who have followed the Stevens and Parrish study. Gardom and Milner spare only one sentence on high grazers like brachiosaurids, so it seemed to me that the discussion was somewhat unbalanced in that regard.

    The pleurokinetic nature hadrosaurid skulls is still accepted by some, but after seeing the work of Holliday, that view is becoming less well accepted. Of course, Casey and I worked in the same lab getting our doctorates, so I am biased in this view, I am sure. Nevertheless, while I at one time found the purportedly highly mobile skulls of the hadrosaurs to be a great hypothesis, the more I learned about anatomy the less likely I found it. If they had any degree of pleurokinesis, it was much less than is commonly presumed. I think this is one place where the coolness of the idea has encouraged people to exaggerate its effectiveness.

    I think the comparison with Sampson’s book quite valid, an astute observation. I quite like the tact both books take and they do a great job. There is less text and more illustrations in the Gardom and Milner book, making it more accessible for more people at younger grades. Sampson’s book will provide more meat to those wanting more after reading this book. The AMNH exhibit is also quite well aligned with the book, good catch. I think your review is quite good and I agree about the artwork. Sibbick is an excellent artist, but the illustrations in this book are getting rather dated. I just noticed while writing this that the dromaeosaur on the cover had the broken wristed “bunny” hands so often drawn on dinosaurs, but which we know to be wrong.

    Not so sure the book really brings out why dinosaurs are important today, at least not explicitly, although it does show well that they are important. I do think it shows that our view of the world and the boundaries of living creatures, if limited by only what we see today, would be very myopic compared to our view after seeing just how far life has gone in the history of the planet. The books also portray science as dynamic and changeable as new data is always being incorporated, expanding or changing what we think we know, which is a good lesson for readers, considering that too many people view scientists as either knowing everything or nothing, a rather silly dichotomy in my opinion, but common nonetheless. I particularly like the picture comparing reproductions of Iguanodon by Waterhouse Hawkins for the Crystal Palace in 1853 to the 1940s versions to the more modern semi-bipedal stance. So in this sense at least, the book does an excellent job of showing the importance of dinosaurs to today.

    The image on the pages in the fourth picture are the same as in my copy, but I hadn’t noticed the book flaps are indeed different. The image was taken from the Amazon images for the book and I didn’t realize that particular image is from the 1993 book, not the 2006 copy. If the Sibbick images are carryovers from the 1993 edition, that would explain the dated look of some of them.

    • Herman Diaz says:

      As always, many thanks for getting back to me. Also, many thanks for confirming the validity of my review’s analogies.

      “I just noticed while writing this that the dromaeosaur on the cover had the broken wristed “bunny” hands so often drawn on dinosaurs, but which we know to be wrong.”

      Kokoro’s Velociraptor model is actually 1 of my favorites next to Rey’s. AFAICT, the palms seem to be folded back against the arms & facing inwards like those of birds. I think it’s easier to see what I mean in this picture: http://piclib.nhm.ac.uk/results.asp?image=049426&itemw=4&itemf=0001&itemstep=1&itemx=13

      “I particularly like the picture comparing reproductions of Iguanodon by Waterhouse Hawkins for the Crystal Palace in 1853 to the 1940s versions to the more modern semi-bipedal stance. So in this sense at least, the book does an excellent job of showing the importance of dinosaurs to today.”

      I like that picture too. I asked about Chapter 8 b/c it starts w/the question, “Why are people so interested in dinosaurs?”, & then seems to answer that question by showing how important dinos are today. “AN ENDLESS ATTRACTION” in particular seems to sum up what you said in your answer to my question (E.g. “Every new fossil find has the potential to challenge the accepted wisdom about a dinosaur species or even dinosaurs in general. What if fossilized skin were found with the colour somehow preserved? What if a family of Tyrannosaurus hatchlings was discovered? Or evidence of even larger sauropods than Argentinosaurus? Anyone could make such a find. Amateur fossil collectors are the eyes and hands of dinosaur scientists around the world. No other branch on science offers such a potential opportunity for non-experts to participate or such exciting rewards for doing so”).

      • paleoaerie says:

        You make an excellent point. Paleontology is unusually amenable to important contributions by amateurs making it a great gateway to experiencing science.

  3. Herman Diaz says:

    Hope you don’t mind me commenting on an older post. I just wanted to get back to you about a few related things.

    1stly, have you read Norell et al.’s “Discovering Dinosaurs: Evolution, Extinction, and the Lessons of Prehistory, Expanded and Updated” ( http://www.amazon.com/Discovering-Dinosaurs-Evolution-Extinction-Prehistory/dp/0520225015 )? I ask b/c Q&A #50 (“How does dinosaur study benefit modern humans?”) refers to Q&A #3 (“Why are dinosaur fossils so interesting?”), both of which seem similar to “AN ENDLESS ATTRACTION”. I wanted to make sure that it wasn’t just me, hence why I originally asked about Chapter 8.

    2ndly, some good news: To quote Barrett ( http://newviewsonoldbones.blogspot.com/2015/12/farewell-2015.html ), “Another major push at public outreach was the completion of a new official NHM dinosaur book, which I co-authored with Darren Naish: Darren did most of the heavy lifting, however, and deserves the lion’s share of the credit. This new title should hit the bookshelves in the next couple of months and will boast some new artworks by Bob Nicholls.” Given that my #1 all-time favorite book is a NHM dino book, this is very exciting for me!

    3rdly, some more good news: http://newviewsonoldbones.blogspot.com/2016/01/the-shape-of-things-to-come.html

    4thly, don’t forget to update the “Recommended” section. 😉

    • paleoaerie says:

      I remember seeing Norell’s book and flipping through it, but I haven’t really read it and honestly don’t remember much about it. I will have to go back and look at it more closely.

      That is excellent news about Barrett’s book! Both Barrett and Naish write well and are extremely knowledgeable, so I am sure the book will be excellent.

      Glad to hear the NHM is working on that. I visited the museum once and remember well the congestion of which they speak, which is a shame because they have some fantastic mounts. Well worth the frustrations.

      Thanks for the reminder. The recommendations have been sadly neglected and I plan on working on them more in the next couple of months. I’d better, as I am planning on giving a talk about that very topic at the beginning of April.

Comments are welcomed, although please be considerate. This site is moderated and rudeness will be ruthlessly eliminated.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: